This study provides a mathematical model that delivers fundamental data for developing a pricing strategy for fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs). A mathematical model that transforms the life-cycle cost of a hydrogen vehicle into the corresponding gasoline vehicle is designed using cost-benefit analysis and life-cycle analysis. The FCEV obtains economic advantages when its life-cycle cost is less than or equal to the life-cycle cost of the corresponding gasoline vehicle. Because there is a trade-off between the FCEV’s price and the hydrogen fuel price, the results provide a number of price combinations that can be used for decision-making purposes. Using this model, car makers can develop a number of FCEV pricing scenarios, and policy makers can establish support systems to encourage the market entrance of FCEVs such as a subsidy for purchasing and producing FCEVs and/or hydrogen energy. This study delivers a number of combinations of FCEV-hydrogen fuel pricing combinations, comparing the life-cycle costs of conventional gasoline vehicles and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles.
Published in | Science Journal of Energy Engineering (Volume 2, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.sjee.20140202.12 |
Page(s) | 13-17 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle (FCEV), Life-Cycle Cost, Transformation Model, Hydrogen Fuel Price, Price Scenario
[1] | A. Simpson, “Cost-benefit analysis of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle technology,” Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS-22), Japan, pp. 23-28, October 2006 [Pre-sented at the 22nd International Battery]. |
[2] | IEA (International Energy Agency), Transport, energy and CO2: moving toward substantiality, 2009. |
[3] | J. L. Forbis and N. T. Mehta, “Eco-nomic value to the customer,” The McKinsey Quarterly, vol. 3, pp. 49-52, 1979. |
[4] | J. L. Forbis and N. T. Mehta, “Value-based strategy for industrial products,” The McKinsey Quarterly, summer, pp. 35-52, 1981. |
[5] | J. Y. Lee, M. Yoo, K. Cha and T. Hur, “Life cycle cost analysis to examine the economical feasibility of hydrogen as an alternative fuel,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 34, pp.4243-4255, 2009. |
[6] | M. Granovskii, I. Dincer and M. A. Rosen, “Econom-ic and environmental comparison of conventional, hybrid, electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 159, pp.1186-1193, 2006. |
[7] | M. J. Allen and W. M. Yen, In-troduction to measurement theory, Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, 2002. |
[8] | M. W. Melaina and G. Saur, “Cost Comparison of Wind Energy Delivered as Electricity or Hydrogen for Vehicles,” Fuel 2013, pp.09-11, 2013. |
[9] | U. Cano-Castillo, “Hydrogen and Fuel Cells: Potential Elements in the Energy Transition Scenario,” REVISTA MEXICANA DE FISICA, vol. 59, pp.85-92, 2013. |
APA Style
Jungin Kim, Yeonhee Lee. (2014). A Mathematical Model for Estimating the Life-Cycle Costs of Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles. Science Journal of Energy Engineering, 2(2), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjee.20140202.12
ACS Style
Jungin Kim; Yeonhee Lee. A Mathematical Model for Estimating the Life-Cycle Costs of Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles. Sci. J. Energy Eng. 2014, 2(2), 13-17. doi: 10.11648/j.sjee.20140202.12
AMA Style
Jungin Kim, Yeonhee Lee. A Mathematical Model for Estimating the Life-Cycle Costs of Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles. Sci J Energy Eng. 2014;2(2):13-17. doi: 10.11648/j.sjee.20140202.12
@article{10.11648/j.sjee.20140202.12, author = {Jungin Kim and Yeonhee Lee}, title = {A Mathematical Model for Estimating the Life-Cycle Costs of Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles}, journal = {Science Journal of Energy Engineering}, volume = {2}, number = {2}, pages = {13-17}, doi = {10.11648/j.sjee.20140202.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjee.20140202.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjee.20140202.12}, abstract = {This study provides a mathematical model that delivers fundamental data for developing a pricing strategy for fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs). A mathematical model that transforms the life-cycle cost of a hydrogen vehicle into the corresponding gasoline vehicle is designed using cost-benefit analysis and life-cycle analysis. The FCEV obtains economic advantages when its life-cycle cost is less than or equal to the life-cycle cost of the corresponding gasoline vehicle. Because there is a trade-off between the FCEV’s price and the hydrogen fuel price, the results provide a number of price combinations that can be used for decision-making purposes. Using this model, car makers can develop a number of FCEV pricing scenarios, and policy makers can establish support systems to encourage the market entrance of FCEVs such as a subsidy for purchasing and producing FCEVs and/or hydrogen energy. This study delivers a number of combinations of FCEV-hydrogen fuel pricing combinations, comparing the life-cycle costs of conventional gasoline vehicles and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles.}, year = {2014} }
TY - JOUR T1 - A Mathematical Model for Estimating the Life-Cycle Costs of Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles AU - Jungin Kim AU - Yeonhee Lee Y1 - 2014/05/20 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjee.20140202.12 DO - 10.11648/j.sjee.20140202.12 T2 - Science Journal of Energy Engineering JF - Science Journal of Energy Engineering JO - Science Journal of Energy Engineering SP - 13 EP - 17 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-8126 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjee.20140202.12 AB - This study provides a mathematical model that delivers fundamental data for developing a pricing strategy for fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs). A mathematical model that transforms the life-cycle cost of a hydrogen vehicle into the corresponding gasoline vehicle is designed using cost-benefit analysis and life-cycle analysis. The FCEV obtains economic advantages when its life-cycle cost is less than or equal to the life-cycle cost of the corresponding gasoline vehicle. Because there is a trade-off between the FCEV’s price and the hydrogen fuel price, the results provide a number of price combinations that can be used for decision-making purposes. Using this model, car makers can develop a number of FCEV pricing scenarios, and policy makers can establish support systems to encourage the market entrance of FCEVs such as a subsidy for purchasing and producing FCEVs and/or hydrogen energy. This study delivers a number of combinations of FCEV-hydrogen fuel pricing combinations, comparing the life-cycle costs of conventional gasoline vehicles and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. VL - 2 IS - 2 ER -