A Comparative Study of Split-Root and Bone Removal in the Extraction of Mandibular Impacted Third Molars

Wen-chao Li; Ning Ruan; Guang-hui Lv; Yang Lin; Min-qiang Zhao; Bo-chen Lei; Yi-fu Wang; Wei Zu; Yuan Tian

doi:doi:10.11648/j.js.20160402.11

| Peer-Reviewed

A Comparative Study of Split-Root and Bone Removal in the Extraction of Mandibular Impacted Third Molars

Wen-chao Li, Ning Ruan, Guang-hui Lv, Yang Lin, Min-qiang Zhao, Bo-chen Lei, Yi-fu Wang, Wei Zu, Yuan Tian

Published in Journal of Surgery (Volume 4, Issue 2)

Received: 6 March 2016 Published: 6 March 2016

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This paper is aimed to compare the effects of split-root procedures and bone removal procedures in the extraction of mandibular medial vertical impacted third molars. This was a prospective study conducted at the Department of Oral Surgery of the Chifeng College Affiliated Hospital on consecutive patients between January 2015 and December 2015. The study result showed that the operative time of the split-root group was shorter, and the dental root fracture was less than the bone removal group. This study suggested that the short-term outcomes of medial vertical impacted third molar operations (facial swelling, pain and mouth opening) differed depending on the surgical approach.

Published in	Journal of Surgery (Volume 4, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.js.20160402.11
Page(s)	8-12
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Split-Root, Bone Removal, Vertical Impacted Teeth, Third Molar

References

[1]	Archer WH. Oral Surgery: A Step-By-Step Atlas of Operative Techniques. 4th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1966: 507–510.
[2]	de Santana Santos T, Calazans AC, Martins-Filho PR, Silva LC, de Oliveira ESED, Gomes AC. Evaluation of the muscle relaxant cyclobenzaprine after third-molar extraction. J Am Dent Assoc 2011, 142: 1154–1162.
[3]	Akadiri OA, Fasola AO, Arotiba JT. Evaluation of Pederson index as an instrument for predicting difficulty of third molar surgical extraction. Niger Postgrad Med J 2009, 16: 105–108.
[4]	Samira M. Al-Anqudi, Salim Al-Sudairy, Ahmed Al-Hosni, and Abdullah Al-Maniri. Prevalence and Pattern of Third Molar Impaction. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2014, 14(3): e388–e392.
[5]	Ahu Topkara, Zafer Sari. Investigation of third molar impaction in Turkish orthodontic patients: Prevalence, depth and angular positions. Eur J Dent, 2013, 7 (Suppl 1): S94–S98.
[6]	Quek SL, Tay CK, Tay KH, Toh SL, Lim KC. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: a retrospective radiographic survey. Int J Oral Maxillafac Surg, 2003, 32: 548–552.
[7]	Kruger E, Thomson WM, Konthasinghe P. Third molar outcomes from age 18 to 26: findings from a population-based New Zealand longitudinal study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2001, 92(2): 150–155.
[8]	Yuasa H, Sugiura M. Clinical postoperative findings after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: prediction of postoperative facial swelling and pain based on preoperative variables. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004, 42(3): 209-214.
[9]	Zhi-yuan ZHANG, Guang-yan YU. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Surgical removal of impacted tooth. 7th ed. Bei-jing: People's Health, 2013, 116.
[10]	DA Ruta, E Bissias, S Ogston, GR Ogden. Assessing health outcomes after extraction of third molars: the postoperative symptoms severity (PoSSe) scale. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2000, 38: 480–487.
[11]	Akadiri OA, Obiechina AE. Assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery -- a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 67: 771–774.
[12]	GA Garcia, FH Sampedro, JH Rey, MG Torreira. Trismus and pain after removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1997, 55: 1223–1226.
[13]	M Chiapasco, L De Cicco, K Marroneh. Side effects and complications associated with third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1993, 76: 412–420.
[14]	V Lopes, R Mumenya, C Feinmann, M Harris. Third molar surgery: an audit of the indications for surgery, post operative complaints and patient satisfaction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1995, 33: 33–35.
[15]	Ren-yi SUN, Ping-juan FANG, Jin XIAO, Deng-feng LIU, Xing-qiao XU, Rong-dang HU.A comparative study of split-root and medial resistance removal in extraction of medially impacted tooth. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2012, 21: 344–349.
[16]	Barbosa-Rebellato NL, Thomé AC, Costa-Maciel C, Oliveira J, Scariot R. Factors associated with complications of removal of third molars: a transversal study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2011, 16: e376–380.
[17]	Gbotolorun OM, Arotiba GT, Ladeinde AL. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 65: 1977–1983.
[18]	Tiwana PS, Foy SP, Shugars DA, Marciani RD, Conrad SM, Phillips C. The impact of intravenous corticosteroids with third molar surgery in patients at high risk for delayed health- related quality of life and clinical recovery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2005, 63: 55–62.
[19]	Thiago de Santana-Santos, Jadson A. de Souza Santos, Paulo R.Martins- Filho, Luiz C. da Silva, Emanuel D. de Oliveira e Silva, Ana C. Gomes. Prediction of postoperative facial swelling, pain and trismus following third molar surgery based on preoperative variables. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, Jan 2013, 18(1): e65–e70.
[20]	Zandi M. Comparison of corticosteroids and rubber drain for reduction of sequelae after third molar surgery. J oral Maxillofac Surg 2008 12: 29-33.
[21]	Renton T, Smeeton N, McGurk M. Factors predictive of difficulty of mandibular third molar surgery. Br Dent J, 2001 190: 607–610.
[22]	Benediktsdóttir IS, Wenzel A, Petersen JK, Hintze H. Mandibular third molar removal: risk indicators for extended operation time, postoperative pain, and complications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2004, 97: 438–446.
[23]	Yuasa H, Kawai T, Sugiura M. Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2002, 40: 26–31.
[24]	Garcia AG, Sampedro FG, Rey JG, Vila PG, Martin MS. Pell-Gregory classification is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty in extracting impacted lower third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2000, 38: 585–587.
[25]	Samir M, Abdul M, Seema A H, Mohammed Abid Z H.Mandibular third molar impactions in male adults: Relationship of Operative time and Types of impaction on inflammatory complications. J Int Oral Health, 2014, 6(2): 9–15.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Wen-chao Li, Ning Ruan, Guang-hui Lv, Yang Lin, Min-qiang Zhao, et al. (2016). A Comparative Study of Split-Root and Bone Removal in the Extraction of Mandibular Impacted Third Molars. Journal of Surgery, 4(2), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20160402.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Wen-chao Li; Ning Ruan; Guang-hui Lv; Yang Lin; Min-qiang Zhao, et al. A Comparative Study of Split-Root and Bone Removal in the Extraction of Mandibular Impacted Third Molars. J. Surg. 2016, 4(2), 8-12. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20160402.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Wen-chao Li, Ning Ruan, Guang-hui Lv, Yang Lin, Min-qiang Zhao, et al. A Comparative Study of Split-Root and Bone Removal in the Extraction of Mandibular Impacted Third Molars. J Surg. 2016;4(2):8-12. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20160402.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.js.20160402.11,
  author = {Wen-chao Li and Ning Ruan and Guang-hui Lv and Yang Lin and Min-qiang Zhao and Bo-chen Lei and Yi-fu Wang and Wei Zu and Yuan Tian},
  title = {A Comparative Study of Split-Root and Bone Removal in the Extraction of Mandibular Impacted Third Molars},
  journal = {Journal of Surgery},
  volume = {4},
  number = {2},
  pages = {8-12},
  doi = {10.11648/j.js.20160402.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20160402.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.js.20160402.11},
  abstract = {This paper is aimed to compare the effects of split-root procedures and bone removal procedures in the extraction of mandibular medial vertical impacted third molars. This was a prospective study conducted at the Department of Oral Surgery of the Chifeng College Affiliated Hospital on consecutive patients between January 2015 and December 2015. The study result showed that the operative time of the split-root group was shorter, and the dental root fracture was less than the bone removal group. This study suggested that the short-term outcomes of medial vertical impacted third molar operations (facial swelling, pain and mouth opening) differed depending on the surgical approach.},
 year = {2016}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Comparative Study of Split-Root and Bone Removal in the Extraction of Mandibular Impacted Third Molars
AU  - Wen-chao Li
AU  - Ning Ruan
AU  - Guang-hui Lv
AU  - Yang Lin
AU  - Min-qiang Zhao
AU  - Bo-chen Lei
AU  - Yi-fu Wang
AU  - Wei Zu
AU  - Yuan Tian
Y1  - 2016/03/06
PY  - 2016
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20160402.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.js.20160402.11
T2  - Journal of Surgery
JF  - Journal of Surgery
JO  - Journal of Surgery
SP  - 8
EP  - 12
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-0930
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20160402.11
AB  - This paper is aimed to compare the effects of split-root procedures and bone removal procedures in the extraction of mandibular medial vertical impacted third molars. This was a prospective study conducted at the Department of Oral Surgery of the Chifeng College Affiliated Hospital on consecutive patients between January 2015 and December 2015. The study result showed that the operative time of the split-root group was shorter, and the dental root fracture was less than the bone removal group. This study suggested that the short-term outcomes of medial vertical impacted third molar operations (facial swelling, pain and mouth opening) differed depending on the surgical approach.
VL  - 4
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Wen-chao Li

Department of Oral Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng College, Chifeng, China
Ning Ruan

Department of Oral Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng College, Chifeng, China
Guang-hui Lv

Department of Oral Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng College, Chifeng, China
Yang Lin

Department of Oral Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng College, Chifeng, China
Min-qiang Zhao

Department of Oral Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng College, Chifeng, China
Bo-chen Lei

Department of Oral Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng College, Chifeng, China
Yi-fu Wang

Department of Oral Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng College, Chifeng, China
Wei Zu

Department of Oral Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng College, Chifeng, China
Yuan Tian

Department of Oral Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng College, Chifeng, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Wen-chao Li, Ning Ruan, Guang-hui Lv, Yang Lin, Min-qiang Zhao, et al. (2016). A Comparative Study of Split-Root and Bone Removal in the Extraction of Mandibular Impacted Third Molars. Journal of Surgery, 4(2), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20160402.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Wen-chao Li; Ning Ruan; Guang-hui Lv; Yang Lin; Min-qiang Zhao, et al. A Comparative Study of Split-Root and Bone Removal in the Extraction of Mandibular Impacted Third Molars. J. Surg. 2016, 4(2), 8-12. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20160402.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Wen-chao Li, Ning Ruan, Guang-hui Lv, Yang Lin, Min-qiang Zhao, et al. A Comparative Study of Split-Root and Bone Removal in the Extraction of Mandibular Impacted Third Molars. J Surg. 2016;4(2):8-12. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20160402.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.js.20160402.11,
  author = {Wen-chao Li and Ning Ruan and Guang-hui Lv and Yang Lin and Min-qiang Zhao and Bo-chen Lei and Yi-fu Wang and Wei Zu and Yuan Tian},
  title = {A Comparative Study of Split-Root and Bone Removal in the Extraction of Mandibular Impacted Third Molars},
  journal = {Journal of Surgery},
  volume = {4},
  number = {2},
  pages = {8-12},
  doi = {10.11648/j.js.20160402.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20160402.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.js.20160402.11},
  abstract = {This paper is aimed to compare the effects of split-root procedures and bone removal procedures in the extraction of mandibular medial vertical impacted third molars. This was a prospective study conducted at the Department of Oral Surgery of the Chifeng College Affiliated Hospital on consecutive patients between January 2015 and December 2015. The study result showed that the operative time of the split-root group was shorter, and the dental root fracture was less than the bone removal group. This study suggested that the short-term outcomes of medial vertical impacted third molar operations (facial swelling, pain and mouth opening) differed depending on the surgical approach.},
 year = {2016}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Comparative Study of Split-Root and Bone Removal in the Extraction of Mandibular Impacted Third Molars
AU  - Wen-chao Li
AU  - Ning Ruan
AU  - Guang-hui Lv
AU  - Yang Lin
AU  - Min-qiang Zhao
AU  - Bo-chen Lei
AU  - Yi-fu Wang
AU  - Wei Zu
AU  - Yuan Tian
Y1  - 2016/03/06
PY  - 2016
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20160402.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.js.20160402.11
T2  - Journal of Surgery
JF  - Journal of Surgery
JO  - Journal of Surgery
SP  - 8
EP  - 12
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-0930
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20160402.11
AB  - This paper is aimed to compare the effects of split-root procedures and bone removal procedures in the extraction of mandibular medial vertical impacted third molars. This was a prospective study conducted at the Department of Oral Surgery of the Chifeng College Affiliated Hospital on consecutive patients between January 2015 and December 2015. The study result showed that the operative time of the split-root group was shorter, and the dental root fracture was less than the bone removal group. This study suggested that the short-term outcomes of medial vertical impacted third molar operations (facial swelling, pain and mouth opening) differed depending on the surgical approach.
VL  - 4
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download