The scramjet cooling heat has a big potential work between the heat and the fuel coolant. However, there is no idea about the maximum potential work of the heat from cooling scramjet. Therefore, the potential work of the scramjet cooling heat is studied. The maximum available work from the heat of cooling scramjet is evaluated by the exergy analysis. The heat exergy analysis model is proposed under the heat sources condition according to the heat transfer performance of the scramjet wall and fuel coolant. It is supposed that a closed thermodynamic system is performed between hot source and cold source. The heat flow, the heat exergy and the available work from the scramjet wall are 543.1kW, 407.3kW and 370.3kW, respectively, when the temperature of scramjet wall is 1200K. And the exergy efficiency of the closed system is 68.2%. The exergy losses of external irreversible processes between the closed system and heat sources are analyzed by considering the heat exchanging temperature differences. The external exergy losses and the exergy efficiency have been largely changed with the heat exchanging temperature differences between the closed system and heat sources. The heat exchanging temperature differences are decreased, the external exergy losses are decreased and the exergy efficiency is increased. However, the heat exchanging temperature differences would be adapted to heat exchanging processes and decreasing the acreage of heat exchange. It is meaningful for having a guidance of power generation for hypersonic vehicle.
Published in | International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering (Volume 7, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijepe.20180704.11 |
Page(s) | 47-53 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Scramjet, Exergy, Available Work, Exergy Loss
[1] | Chang J, Bao W, Yu D. Hypersonic inlet control with pulse periodic energy addition. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 2009; 223: 85-94. |
[2] | Mahapatra D, Jagadeesh G. Shock tunnel studies on cowl/ramp shock interactions in a generic scramjet inlet. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 2008; 222: 1183-91. |
[3] | Kontis K. Flow control effectiveness of jets, strakes, and flares at hypersonic speeds. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 2008; 222: 585-603. |
[4] | Bao W, Qin J, Yu D. Integrated thermal management method of energy based on Closed Brayton Cycle for scramjet. 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference. AIAA 2006-4685. |
[5] | Yang Q, Chang J, Bao W. Thermodynamic analysis on specific thrust of the hydrocarbon fueled scramjet. Energy 2014; 76: 552-8. |
[6] | Qin J, Bao W, Zhou W, Yu D. Performance cycle analysis of an open cooling cycle for scramjet. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 2009; 223: 599-607. |
[7] | Bao W, Qin J, Zhou W, Yu D. Parametric performance analysis of multiple re-cooled cycle for hydrogen fueled scramjet. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2009; 34: 7334-41. |
[8] | Bao W, Qin J, Zhou W, Zhang D, Yu D. Power generation and heat sink improvement characteristics of recooling cycle for thermal cracked hydrocarbon fueled scramjet. Sci China Technol Sci 2011; 54: 955-63. |
[9] | Bao W, Zhang D, Qin J, Zhou W. Performance analysis on fuel turbo-pump and motor system of scramjet engine. 10th International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference. AIAA 2012-4159. |
[10] | Zhang D, Qin J, Feng Y, Ren F, Bao W. Performance evaluation of power generation system with fuel vapor turbine onboard hydrocarbon fueled scramjets. Energy 2014; 77: 732-741. |
[11] | Qin J, Bao W, Zhou W, Yu D. Thermal management system performance analysis of hypersonic vehicle based on Closed Brayton Cycle. 44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. AIAA 2008-5178. |
[12] | Qin J, Zhou W, Bao W, Yu D. Thermodynamic analysis and parametric study of a closed Brayton cycle thermal management system for scramjet. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2010; 35: 356 - 364. |
[13] | Christopher K, Thomas S, Nikolaos M. Exergy analysis of renewable energy sources. Renewable Energy 2003; 28: 295–310. |
[14] | Park S, Pandey A, Tyagi V, Tyagi S. Energy and exergy analysis of typical renewable energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2014; 30: 105–123. |
[15] | Önder K. Energy and exergy analysis of an organic Rankine for power generation from waste heat recovery in steel industry. Energy Conversion and Management 2014; 77: 108-117. |
[16] | Shu G, Zhao J, Tian H, Liang X, Wei H. Parametric and exergetic analysis of waste heat recovery system based on thermoelectric generator and organic rankine cycle utilizing R123. Energy 2012; 45: 806-816. |
[17] | Aiichiro T, Hiroyuki Y, Kazuyuki M. Advanced thermal protection systems for reusable launch vehicles. 10th International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, 2001, Japan, 2001-1909. |
APA Style
Xinchun Li, Heyang Miao, Zhongwei Wang, Yaobin Niu. (2018). Evaluation the Scramjet Cooling Heat for Available Work Using Exergy Analysis. International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 7(4), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20180704.11
ACS Style
Xinchun Li; Heyang Miao; Zhongwei Wang; Yaobin Niu. Evaluation the Scramjet Cooling Heat for Available Work Using Exergy Analysis. Int. J. Energy Power Eng. 2018, 7(4), 47-53. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepe.20180704.11
AMA Style
Xinchun Li, Heyang Miao, Zhongwei Wang, Yaobin Niu. Evaluation the Scramjet Cooling Heat for Available Work Using Exergy Analysis. Int J Energy Power Eng. 2018;7(4):47-53. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepe.20180704.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijepe.20180704.11, author = {Xinchun Li and Heyang Miao and Zhongwei Wang and Yaobin Niu}, title = {Evaluation the Scramjet Cooling Heat for Available Work Using Exergy Analysis}, journal = {International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering}, volume = {7}, number = {4}, pages = {47-53}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijepe.20180704.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20180704.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijepe.20180704.11}, abstract = {The scramjet cooling heat has a big potential work between the heat and the fuel coolant. However, there is no idea about the maximum potential work of the heat from cooling scramjet. Therefore, the potential work of the scramjet cooling heat is studied. The maximum available work from the heat of cooling scramjet is evaluated by the exergy analysis. The heat exergy analysis model is proposed under the heat sources condition according to the heat transfer performance of the scramjet wall and fuel coolant. It is supposed that a closed thermodynamic system is performed between hot source and cold source. The heat flow, the heat exergy and the available work from the scramjet wall are 543.1kW, 407.3kW and 370.3kW, respectively, when the temperature of scramjet wall is 1200K. And the exergy efficiency of the closed system is 68.2%. The exergy losses of external irreversible processes between the closed system and heat sources are analyzed by considering the heat exchanging temperature differences. The external exergy losses and the exergy efficiency have been largely changed with the heat exchanging temperature differences between the closed system and heat sources. The heat exchanging temperature differences are decreased, the external exergy losses are decreased and the exergy efficiency is increased. However, the heat exchanging temperature differences would be adapted to heat exchanging processes and decreasing the acreage of heat exchange. It is meaningful for having a guidance of power generation for hypersonic vehicle.}, year = {2018} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation the Scramjet Cooling Heat for Available Work Using Exergy Analysis AU - Xinchun Li AU - Heyang Miao AU - Zhongwei Wang AU - Yaobin Niu Y1 - 2018/11/12 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20180704.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijepe.20180704.11 T2 - International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering JF - International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering JO - International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering SP - 47 EP - 53 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-960X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20180704.11 AB - The scramjet cooling heat has a big potential work between the heat and the fuel coolant. However, there is no idea about the maximum potential work of the heat from cooling scramjet. Therefore, the potential work of the scramjet cooling heat is studied. The maximum available work from the heat of cooling scramjet is evaluated by the exergy analysis. The heat exergy analysis model is proposed under the heat sources condition according to the heat transfer performance of the scramjet wall and fuel coolant. It is supposed that a closed thermodynamic system is performed between hot source and cold source. The heat flow, the heat exergy and the available work from the scramjet wall are 543.1kW, 407.3kW and 370.3kW, respectively, when the temperature of scramjet wall is 1200K. And the exergy efficiency of the closed system is 68.2%. The exergy losses of external irreversible processes between the closed system and heat sources are analyzed by considering the heat exchanging temperature differences. The external exergy losses and the exergy efficiency have been largely changed with the heat exchanging temperature differences between the closed system and heat sources. The heat exchanging temperature differences are decreased, the external exergy losses are decreased and the exergy efficiency is increased. However, the heat exchanging temperature differences would be adapted to heat exchanging processes and decreasing the acreage of heat exchange. It is meaningful for having a guidance of power generation for hypersonic vehicle. VL - 7 IS - 4 ER -