Conventional, Acupuncture-Like or Brief-Intense: Is There Any Difference Between TENS Modalities According to Outcomes of Chronic Low Back Pain with Lumbar Disc Herniation

Ilker Ilhanli

doi:doi:10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14

| Peer-Reviewed

Conventional, Acupuncture-Like or Brief-Intense: Is There Any Difference Between TENS Modalities According to Outcomes of Chronic Low Back Pain with Lumbar Disc Herniation

Ilker Ilhanli

Published in Clinical Medicine Research (Volume 4, Issue 5)

Received: 21 July 2015 Accepted: 28 July 2015 Published: 5 August 2015

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the differences between Conventional, Acupuncture-like and Brief-intense TENS in chronic low back pain with lumbar disc herniation. Methods: 160 patients who were diagnosed as lumbar disc herniation were randomized into 4 groups: Group1= Conventional TENS, Group2= Acupuncture-like TENS, Group3= Brief-intense TENS, Group4= Sham TENS. Hotpack, ultrasound and exercise were applied all groups (5 days/week for 3 weeks). Patients were evaluated before treatment, a week after baseline, at the end of treatment and a month after the end of treatment. Ostwestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OLBP) and Short-Form 36 physical component (SF-36PCS), mental component (SF-36MCS) scores, Modified Lumbar Schober test (MLS), Straight Leg Raising test (SLR) and Femoral Stretching test (FS) results and Visual Analog Scale for pain (VAS) at activity and at rest were recorded. After the exclusion, statistical analysis was administered to 135 participants (44 males and 91 females). Results: There were no differences according to demographic data (p>0,05). For each evaluation step, we compared the means of MLS, SLR, VASactivity, VASrest, OLBP, SF-36PCS and SF-36MCS and found no significant difference (p>0,05). At the end of first week, all groups showed significant improvement according to SLR (p=0,046, p=0,035, p=0,035, p=0,045, respectively) and VASrest (p=0,038, p=0,048, p=0,045, p=0,048, respectively); only group 1 (p=0,034) and group 3 (p=0,045) showed significant improvement for VASactivity. At the end of treatment, all groups showed significant improvement for MLS, SLR, VASactivity, VASrest, OLBP and SF-36PCS (p<0,05). Conclusions: Pain relief is seem to be starting earlier in treatment regimens including conventional and brief-intense TENS. Probably, final outcomes of the treatment regimens for pain and functional capacity, with or without TENS don’t differ.

Published in	Clinical Medicine Research (Volume 4, Issue 5)
DOI	10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14
Page(s)	143-150
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

TENS, Lumbar Back Pain, Lumbar Disc Herniation

References

[1]	Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 1999;354: 581-585.
[2]	Oliphant D. Safety of spinal manipulation in the treatment of lumbar disk herniations: A systematic review and risk assessment. J Manipulative Physiol Therap 2004; 27(3): 197-209.
[3]	Sluka KA, Bjordal JM, Marchand S, Rakel BA. What Makes Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Work? Making Sense of the Mixed Results in the Clinical Literature. Phys Ther 2013; 93(10): 1397-1402.
[4]	Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP. The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980; 66: 271-273.
[5]	Yakut E, Düger T, Oksüz C, Yörükan S, Ureten K, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29(5): 581-585.
[6]	Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The SF-36 health status survey: 1. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-483.
[7]	Kocyigit H, Aydemir O, Fisek G, Olmez N, Memis A. Kısa form-36’nın Türkce versiyonunun güvenilirliği ve gecerliliği. Ilaç ve Tedavi 1999; 12(2): 102-106.
[8]	Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Wilmink JT, Kester AD, Knottnerus JA. Diagnostic value of history and physical examination in patients suspected of lumbosacral nerve root compression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72(5): 630-634.
[9]	Van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Boster LM. Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common intervention. Spine 1997; 22(18): 2128-2156.
[10]	Rantanen P. Physical measurements and questionnaires as diagnostic tools in chronic low back pain. J Rehabil Med 2001; 33(1): 31-35.
[11]	Wall PD, Sweet WH. Temporary abolition of pain in man. Science 1967; 155: 108-109.
[12]	Pivec R, Stokes M, Chitnis AS, Paulino CB, Harwin SF, Mont MA. Clinical and economic impact of TENS in patients with chronic low back pain: analysis of a nationwide database. Orthopedics 2013; 36(12): 922-928.
[13]	Rattanatharn R, Sanjaroensuttikul N, Anadirekkul P, Chaivisate R, Wannasetta W. Effectiveness of lumbar traction with routine conservative treatment in acute herniated disc syndrome. J Med Assoc Thai 2004; 87(2): 272-277.
[14]	Carette S, Marcoux S, Truchon R, Grondin C, Gagnon J, et al. A controlled trial of corticosteroid injections into facet joints for chronic low back pain. N Engl J Med 1991; 325(14): 1002-1007.
[15]	Papageorgiou AC, Macfarlane GJ, Thomas E, Croft PR, Jayson MI, et al. Psychosocial factors in the workplace — do they predict new episodes of low back pain? Evidence from the South Manchester Back Pain Study. Spine 1997; 22: 1137-1142.
[16]	Harkness EF, Macfarlane GJ, Nahit ES, Silman AJ, McBeth J. Risk factors for new onset low back pain amongst cohorts of newly employed workers. Rheumatology 2003; 42: 959-968.
[17]	Jones GT, Watson KD, Silman AJ, Symmons DPM, Macfarlane GJ. Predictors of low back pain in British schoolchildren: a population-based prospective cohort study. Pediatrics 2003; 111: 822-828.
[18]	Deyo RA, Walsh NE, Martin DC, Schoenfeld LS, Ramamurthy S. A controlled trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and exercise for chronic low back pain. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1627-1634.
[19]	Jarzem PF, Harvey EJ, Arcaro N, Kaczorowski J. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Low Back Pain. J Musculoskelet Pain 2005; 13: 3-9.
[20]	Jarzem PF, Harvey EJ, Arcaro N, Kaczorowski J. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for short-term treatment of low back pain-randomized double blind crossover study of sham verus conventional TENS. J Musculoskelet Pain 2005; 13: 11-17.
[21]	Pop T, Austrup H, Preuss R, Niedziałek M, Zaniewska A, Sobolewski M, Dobrowolski T, Zwolińska J. Effect of TENS on pain relief in patients with degenerative disc disease in lumbosacral spine. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2010; 12(4): 289-300.
[22]	Ratajczak B, Hawrylak A, Demidaś A, Kuciel-Lewandowska J, Boerner E. Effectiveness of diadynamic currents and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in disc disease lumbar part of spine. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2011; 24(3): 155-159.
[23]	Rakel B, Cooper N, Adams HJ, Messer BR, Frey Law LA, et al. A new transient sham TENS device allows for investigator blinding while delivering a true placebo treatment. J Pain 2010; 11: 230-238.
[24]	Moran F, Leonard T, Hawthorne S, Hughes CM, McCrum-Gardner E, et al. Hypoalgesia in response to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) depends on stimulation intensity. J Pain 2011; 12: 929-935.
[25]	Koldas Dogan S, Sonel Tur B, Kurtais Y, Atay MB. Comparison of three different approaches in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Clin Rheumatol 2008; 27: 873-881.
[26]	Tekur P, Singphow C, Nagendra HR, Raghuram N. Effect of short-term intensive yoga program on pain, functional disability, and spinal flexibility in chronic low back pain: a randomized control study. J Altern Complement Med 2008; 14: 637-644.
[27]	Frost H, Klaber Moffet JA, Moser JS, Fairbank JC. Randomised controlled trial for evaluation of fitness programme for patients with chronic low back pain. BMJ 1995; 310: 151-154.
[28]	Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Kuijpers T, Verhagen AP, Ostelo R, Koes BW, Tulder MW. A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J 2011; 20(1): 19-39.
[29]	Unlu Z, Tasci S, Tarhan S, Pabuscu Y, Islak S. Comparison of 3 physical therapy modalities for acute pain in lumbar disc herniation measured by clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2008; 31(3): 191-198.
[30]	Rantanen P. Physical measurements and questionnaires as diagnostic tools in chronic low back pain. J Rehabil Med 2001; 33(1): 31-35.
[31]	Kalra A, Urban MO, Sluka KA. Blockade of opioid receptors in rostral ventral medulla prevents antihyperalgesia produced by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001; 298: 257-263.
[32]	Sluka KA, Deacon M, Stibal A, Strissel S, Terpstra A. Spinal blockade of opioid receptors prevents the analgesia produced by TENS in arthritic rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1999; 289: 840-846.
[33]	Facci LM, Nowotny JP, Tormen F, Trevisani VFM. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential currents (IFC) in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain: randomized clinical trial. Sao Paulo Med J 2011; 129: 206-216.
[34]	Marchand S, Charest J, Li J, Chenard JR, Lavignolle B, Laurencelle L. Is TENS purely a placebo effect? A controlled study on chronic low back pain. Pain 1993; 54: 99-106.
[35]	Rakel B, Frantz R. Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on postoperative pain with movement. J Pain 2003; 4: 455-464.
[36]	Law PP, Cheing GL. Optimal stimulation frequency of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on people with knee osteoarthritis. J Rehabil Med 2004; 36: 220-225.
[37]	Law PPW, Cheing GLY, Tsui AYY. Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation improve the physical performance of people with knee osteoarthritis? J Clin Rheumatol 2004; 10: 295-299.
[38]	Vance CG, Rakel BA, Blodgett NP, DeSantana JM, Amendola A, Zimmerman MB, Walsh DM, Sluka KA. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain, pain sensitivity, and function in people with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther 2012; 92: 898-910.
[39]	Cheing GL, Tsui AY, Lo SK, Hui-Chan CW. Optimal stimulation duration of tens in the management of osteoarthritic knee pain. J Rehabil Med 2003; 35: 62-68.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ilker Ilhanli. (2015). Conventional, Acupuncture-Like or Brief-Intense: Is There Any Difference Between TENS Modalities According to Outcomes of Chronic Low Back Pain with Lumbar Disc Herniation. Clinical Medicine Research, 4(5), 143-150. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ilker Ilhanli. Conventional, Acupuncture-Like or Brief-Intense: Is There Any Difference Between TENS Modalities According to Outcomes of Chronic Low Back Pain with Lumbar Disc Herniation. Clin. Med. Res. 2015, 4(5), 143-150. doi: 10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ilker Ilhanli. Conventional, Acupuncture-Like or Brief-Intense: Is There Any Difference Between TENS Modalities According to Outcomes of Chronic Low Back Pain with Lumbar Disc Herniation. Clin Med Res. 2015;4(5):143-150. doi: 10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14,
  author = {Ilker Ilhanli},
  title = {Conventional, Acupuncture-Like or Brief-Intense: Is There Any Difference Between TENS Modalities According to Outcomes of Chronic Low Back Pain with Lumbar Disc Herniation},
  journal = {Clinical Medicine Research},
  volume = {4},
  number = {5},
  pages = {143-150},
  doi = {10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cmr.20150405.14},
  abstract = {Objectives: To evaluate the differences between Conventional, Acupuncture-like and Brief-intense TENS in chronic low back pain with lumbar disc herniation. Methods: 160 patients who were diagnosed as lumbar disc herniation were randomized into 4 groups: Group1= Conventional TENS, Group2= Acupuncture-like TENS, Group3= Brief-intense TENS, Group4= Sham TENS. Hotpack, ultrasound and exercise were applied all groups (5 days/week for 3 weeks). Patients were evaluated before treatment, a week after baseline, at the end of treatment and a month after the end of treatment. Ostwestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OLBP) and Short-Form 36 physical component (SF-36PCS), mental component (SF-36MCS) scores, Modified Lumbar Schober test (MLS), Straight Leg Raising test (SLR) and Femoral Stretching test (FS) results and Visual Analog Scale for pain (VAS) at activity and at rest were recorded. After the exclusion, statistical analysis was administered to 135 participants (44 males and 91 females). Results: There were no differences according to demographic data (p>0,05). For each evaluation step, we compared the means of MLS, SLR, VASactivity, VASrest, OLBP, SF-36PCS and SF-36MCS and found no significant difference (p>0,05). At the end of first week, all groups showed significant improvement according to SLR (p=0,046, p=0,035, p=0,035, p=0,045, respectively) and VASrest (p=0,038, p=0,048, p=0,045, p=0,048, respectively); only group 1 (p=0,034) and group 3 (p=0,045) showed significant improvement for VASactivity. At the end of treatment, all groups showed significant improvement for MLS, SLR, VASactivity, VASrest, OLBP and SF-36PCS (p<0,05). Conclusions: Pain relief is seem to be starting earlier in treatment regimens including conventional and brief-intense TENS. Probably, final outcomes of the treatment regimens for pain and functional capacity, with or without TENS don’t differ.},
 year = {2015}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Conventional, Acupuncture-Like or Brief-Intense: Is There Any Difference Between TENS Modalities According to Outcomes of Chronic Low Back Pain with Lumbar Disc Herniation
AU  - Ilker Ilhanli
Y1  - 2015/08/05
PY  - 2015
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14
T2  - Clinical Medicine Research
JF  - Clinical Medicine Research
JO  - Clinical Medicine Research
SP  - 143
EP  - 150
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-9057
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14
AB  - Objectives: To evaluate the differences between Conventional, Acupuncture-like and Brief-intense TENS in chronic low back pain with lumbar disc herniation. Methods: 160 patients who were diagnosed as lumbar disc herniation were randomized into 4 groups: Group1= Conventional TENS, Group2= Acupuncture-like TENS, Group3= Brief-intense TENS, Group4= Sham TENS. Hotpack, ultrasound and exercise were applied all groups (5 days/week for 3 weeks). Patients were evaluated before treatment, a week after baseline, at the end of treatment and a month after the end of treatment. Ostwestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OLBP) and Short-Form 36 physical component (SF-36PCS), mental component (SF-36MCS) scores, Modified Lumbar Schober test (MLS), Straight Leg Raising test (SLR) and Femoral Stretching test (FS) results and Visual Analog Scale for pain (VAS) at activity and at rest were recorded. After the exclusion, statistical analysis was administered to 135 participants (44 males and 91 females). Results: There were no differences according to demographic data (p>0,05). For each evaluation step, we compared the means of MLS, SLR, VASactivity, VASrest, OLBP, SF-36PCS and SF-36MCS and found no significant difference (p>0,05). At the end of first week, all groups showed significant improvement according to SLR (p=0,046, p=0,035, p=0,035, p=0,045, respectively) and VASrest (p=0,038, p=0,048, p=0,045, p=0,048, respectively); only group 1 (p=0,034) and group 3 (p=0,045) showed significant improvement for VASactivity. At the end of treatment, all groups showed significant improvement for MLS, SLR, VASactivity, VASrest, OLBP and SF-36PCS (p<0,05). Conclusions: Pain relief is seem to be starting earlier in treatment regimens including conventional and brief-intense TENS. Probably, final outcomes of the treatment regimens for pain and functional capacity, with or without TENS don’t differ.
VL  - 4
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Ilker Ilhanli

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ilker Ilhanli. (2015). Conventional, Acupuncture-Like or Brief-Intense: Is There Any Difference Between TENS Modalities According to Outcomes of Chronic Low Back Pain with Lumbar Disc Herniation. Clinical Medicine Research, 4(5), 143-150. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ilker Ilhanli. Conventional, Acupuncture-Like or Brief-Intense: Is There Any Difference Between TENS Modalities According to Outcomes of Chronic Low Back Pain with Lumbar Disc Herniation. Clin. Med. Res. 2015, 4(5), 143-150. doi: 10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ilker Ilhanli. Conventional, Acupuncture-Like or Brief-Intense: Is There Any Difference Between TENS Modalities According to Outcomes of Chronic Low Back Pain with Lumbar Disc Herniation. Clin Med Res. 2015;4(5):143-150. doi: 10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14,
  author = {Ilker Ilhanli},
  title = {Conventional, Acupuncture-Like or Brief-Intense: Is There Any Difference Between TENS Modalities According to Outcomes of Chronic Low Back Pain with Lumbar Disc Herniation},
  journal = {Clinical Medicine Research},
  volume = {4},
  number = {5},
  pages = {143-150},
  doi = {10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cmr.20150405.14},
  abstract = {Objectives: To evaluate the differences between Conventional, Acupuncture-like and Brief-intense TENS in chronic low back pain with lumbar disc herniation. Methods: 160 patients who were diagnosed as lumbar disc herniation were randomized into 4 groups: Group1= Conventional TENS, Group2= Acupuncture-like TENS, Group3= Brief-intense TENS, Group4= Sham TENS. Hotpack, ultrasound and exercise were applied all groups (5 days/week for 3 weeks). Patients were evaluated before treatment, a week after baseline, at the end of treatment and a month after the end of treatment. Ostwestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OLBP) and Short-Form 36 physical component (SF-36PCS), mental component (SF-36MCS) scores, Modified Lumbar Schober test (MLS), Straight Leg Raising test (SLR) and Femoral Stretching test (FS) results and Visual Analog Scale for pain (VAS) at activity and at rest were recorded. After the exclusion, statistical analysis was administered to 135 participants (44 males and 91 females). Results: There were no differences according to demographic data (p>0,05). For each evaluation step, we compared the means of MLS, SLR, VASactivity, VASrest, OLBP, SF-36PCS and SF-36MCS and found no significant difference (p>0,05). At the end of first week, all groups showed significant improvement according to SLR (p=0,046, p=0,035, p=0,035, p=0,045, respectively) and VASrest (p=0,038, p=0,048, p=0,045, p=0,048, respectively); only group 1 (p=0,034) and group 3 (p=0,045) showed significant improvement for VASactivity. At the end of treatment, all groups showed significant improvement for MLS, SLR, VASactivity, VASrest, OLBP and SF-36PCS (p<0,05). Conclusions: Pain relief is seem to be starting earlier in treatment regimens including conventional and brief-intense TENS. Probably, final outcomes of the treatment regimens for pain and functional capacity, with or without TENS don’t differ.},
 year = {2015}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Conventional, Acupuncture-Like or Brief-Intense: Is There Any Difference Between TENS Modalities According to Outcomes of Chronic Low Back Pain with Lumbar Disc Herniation
AU  - Ilker Ilhanli
Y1  - 2015/08/05
PY  - 2015
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14
T2  - Clinical Medicine Research
JF  - Clinical Medicine Research
JO  - Clinical Medicine Research
SP  - 143
EP  - 150
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-9057
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.20150405.14
AB  - Objectives: To evaluate the differences between Conventional, Acupuncture-like and Brief-intense TENS in chronic low back pain with lumbar disc herniation. Methods: 160 patients who were diagnosed as lumbar disc herniation were randomized into 4 groups: Group1= Conventional TENS, Group2= Acupuncture-like TENS, Group3= Brief-intense TENS, Group4= Sham TENS. Hotpack, ultrasound and exercise were applied all groups (5 days/week for 3 weeks). Patients were evaluated before treatment, a week after baseline, at the end of treatment and a month after the end of treatment. Ostwestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OLBP) and Short-Form 36 physical component (SF-36PCS), mental component (SF-36MCS) scores, Modified Lumbar Schober test (MLS), Straight Leg Raising test (SLR) and Femoral Stretching test (FS) results and Visual Analog Scale for pain (VAS) at activity and at rest were recorded. After the exclusion, statistical analysis was administered to 135 participants (44 males and 91 females). Results: There were no differences according to demographic data (p>0,05). For each evaluation step, we compared the means of MLS, SLR, VASactivity, VASrest, OLBP, SF-36PCS and SF-36MCS and found no significant difference (p>0,05). At the end of first week, all groups showed significant improvement according to SLR (p=0,046, p=0,035, p=0,035, p=0,045, respectively) and VASrest (p=0,038, p=0,048, p=0,045, p=0,048, respectively); only group 1 (p=0,034) and group 3 (p=0,045) showed significant improvement for VASactivity. At the end of treatment, all groups showed significant improvement for MLS, SLR, VASactivity, VASrest, OLBP and SF-36PCS (p<0,05). Conclusions: Pain relief is seem to be starting earlier in treatment regimens including conventional and brief-intense TENS. Probably, final outcomes of the treatment regimens for pain and functional capacity, with or without TENS don’t differ.
VL  - 4
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download