| Peer-Reviewed

Radiation Dose Risk and Diagnostic Benefit in Imaging Investigations

Received: 28 March 2015     Accepted: 30 March 2015     Published: 11 April 2015
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The paper presents many facets of medical imaging investigations radiological risks. The total volume of prescribed medical investigations proves a serious lack in monitoring and tracking of the cumulative radiation doses in many health services. Modern radiological investigations equipment is continuously reducing the total dose of radiation due to improved technologies, so a decrease in per caput dose can be noticed, but the increasing number of investigations has determined a net increase of the annual collective dose. High doses of radiation are cumulated from Computed Tomography investigations. An integrated system for radiation safety of the patients investigated by radiological imaging methods, based on smart cards and Public Key Infrastructure allow radiation absorbed dose data storage.

Published in American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering (Volume 3, Issue 3-1)

This article belongs to the Special Issue Bio-Electronics: Biosensors, Biomedical Signal Processing, and Organic Engineering

DOI 10.11648/j.bio.s.2015030301.14
Page(s) 22-26
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Healthcare, Radiation Doses, Radiation Safety

References
[1] ICRP, “2007, Radiological Protection in Medicine”, ICRP Publication 105 Ann. ICRP 37(6).
[2] Walter Huda, Kent M. Oden and Mohammad R. Khorasani, “Converting Dose-Length Product to Effective Dose at CT“, Radiology. Sep 2008; 248(3): 995–1003, available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18710988.
[3] Siemens, “Dose Parameters and Advanced Dose management on SOMATOM Scanners”, available at www.usa.siemens.com/healthcare
[4] Available at http:// www.euronuclear.org /info/ encyclopedia /t / tissue-weight-factor.htm.
[5] UNSCEAR, the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Answers to Frequently Asked Questions, available at http://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/faq.html.
[6] Kenneth L.Mossman, “The Linear-No-Threshold Debate in Radiation Protection“, available at / www. radpro.com /mossman.pdfssman .pdf.
[7] Hormesis Kaiser J., A healthful dab of radiation?, Science 2003, 302(5644), 378.
[8] Medical Radiation Exposure of the European Population, POart1/2, Radiation protection No 180, Directorate-General for Energy Directorate D — Nuclear Safety & Fuel Cycle Unit D3 — Radiation Protection, 2014, available at https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/RP180.pdf
[9] Radiation and your patient: A Guide for medical Practitioners, A web module produced by Committee 3 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), available at http://www.icrp.org/docs/rad_for_gp_for_web.pdf.
[10] Wall, B.F., Hart, D., “Revised radiation doses for typical x-ray examinations”, Br. J Radiol., 70 833 (1997), pp. 437- 439.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Lidia Dobrescu, Gheorghe-Cristian Rădulescu. (2015). Radiation Dose Risk and Diagnostic Benefit in Imaging Investigations. American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 3(3-1), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.s.2015030301.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Lidia Dobrescu; Gheorghe-Cristian Rădulescu. Radiation Dose Risk and Diagnostic Benefit in Imaging Investigations. Am. J. BioSci. Bioeng. 2015, 3(3-1), 22-26. doi: 10.11648/j.bio.s.2015030301.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Lidia Dobrescu, Gheorghe-Cristian Rădulescu. Radiation Dose Risk and Diagnostic Benefit in Imaging Investigations. Am J BioSci Bioeng. 2015;3(3-1):22-26. doi: 10.11648/j.bio.s.2015030301.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.bio.s.2015030301.14,
      author = {Lidia Dobrescu and Gheorghe-Cristian Rădulescu},
      title = {Radiation Dose Risk and Diagnostic Benefit in Imaging Investigations},
      journal = {American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering},
      volume = {3},
      number = {3-1},
      pages = {22-26},
      doi = {10.11648/j.bio.s.2015030301.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.s.2015030301.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.bio.s.2015030301.14},
      abstract = {The paper presents many facets of medical imaging investigations radiological risks. The total volume of prescribed medical investigations proves a serious lack in monitoring and tracking of the cumulative radiation doses in many health services. Modern radiological investigations equipment is continuously reducing the total dose of radiation due to improved technologies, so a decrease in per caput dose can be noticed, but the increasing number of investigations has determined a net increase of the annual collective dose. High doses of radiation are cumulated from Computed Tomography investigations. An integrated system for radiation safety of the patients investigated by radiological imaging methods, based on smart cards and Public Key Infrastructure allow radiation absorbed dose data storage.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Radiation Dose Risk and Diagnostic Benefit in Imaging Investigations
    AU  - Lidia Dobrescu
    AU  - Gheorghe-Cristian Rădulescu
    Y1  - 2015/04/11
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.s.2015030301.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.bio.s.2015030301.14
    T2  - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering
    JF  - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering
    JO  - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering
    SP  - 22
    EP  - 26
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5893
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.s.2015030301.14
    AB  - The paper presents many facets of medical imaging investigations radiological risks. The total volume of prescribed medical investigations proves a serious lack in monitoring and tracking of the cumulative radiation doses in many health services. Modern radiological investigations equipment is continuously reducing the total dose of radiation due to improved technologies, so a decrease in per caput dose can be noticed, but the increasing number of investigations has determined a net increase of the annual collective dose. High doses of radiation are cumulated from Computed Tomography investigations. An integrated system for radiation safety of the patients investigated by radiological imaging methods, based on smart cards and Public Key Infrastructure allow radiation absorbed dose data storage.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 3-1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Electronics Telecommunications and Information Technology Faculty, University Politehnica of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

  • Sections