Several studies have reported various defluoridation capabilities of plant biomasses. The resultant variations in fluoride removal capacities are associated with the presence of different types of active functional groups in the respective biomasses. This study reports of the fluoride removal efficiencies of sisal leaf biomass in comparison. Comparison with other plant biomasses were made and hence the fluoride removal efficiencies of maize leaf (ML), goose grass (GG), banana false stem (BFS), Aloe vera (AV), untreated sisal fibre (USF) and sisal pith (SP) with similar active functional groups but different stereochemistry and solubility of the active compounds are reported. A portion of 0.5 g of each biomass was mixed with a 10 mg/l fluoride solution in a 10 ml portions under the same experimental conditions. The maximum fluoride removal capacity of sisal fibre biomass was found to be 26.6 %. By comparison, the fluoride removal efficiencies of ML, GG, BFS, AV, USF and SP were found to be, 4.1, 4.6, 7.1, 26.6, 29.4 and 47.3 % respectively. This suggests that, stereochemistry and solubility of the active compounds have a significant role to play in water defluoridation by plant biomasses, and thus, knowledge of the stereochemistry and solubility of the active compounds in plant biomass is very important to fully unlock biomass’ defluoridation potentials.
Published in | American Journal of Chemical Engineering (Volume 2, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajche.20140204.12 |
Page(s) | 42-47 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Stereochemistry, Plant Biomass, Sisal Pith, Sisal Fibre, Inulin
[1] | J. Fawell, K. Bailey, J. Chilton, E. Dahi, L. Fewtrell, and Y. Magara, “Fluorde in drinking water”, IWA Publishing, London, 2006. |
[2] | R. C Meenakshi, R. C. Maheshwari, “Fluoride in drinking water and its removal”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 137, pp. 456-463, 2006. |
[3] | S. Modi, and R. Soni, “Merits and Demerits of different technologies of defluoridation for drinking water”, IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology, Vol. 3, pp. 24-27, 2013. |
[4] | A. Bhatnagar, E. Kumar, and M. Sillanpaa, “Fluoride removal from water by adsorption: A Review”, Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 171, pp. 811-840, 2011. |
[5] | P. Loganathan, S. Vigneswaran, J. Kandasamy, and R. Naidu, “Defluoridation of drinking water using adsorption processes”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 248-249, pp. 1-19, 2013. |
[6] | P. Renuka, and K. Pushpanjali, “Review on defluoridation techniques of water”, The International Journal of Engineering and Science,Vol. 2, pp. 86-94, 2013. |
[7] | S.M.I. Sajidu, W.R.L. Masamba, B. Thole, J.F. Mwatseteza, “Groundwater fluoride levels in villages of Southern Malawi and removal studies using bauxite”, In-ternational Journal of Physical Sciences, Vol. 3, pp. 001-011, 2008. |
[8] | M. Malakootian, M. Moosazadeh, N. Yousefi, and A. Fatehizadeh, “Fluoride removal from aqueous solution by pumice: case study on Kuhbonan water”, African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 5, pp. 299-306, 2011. |
[9] | N.P. Kumar, N.S. Kumar, and A. Krishnaiah, “Defluoridation of water using Tamarind (Tamarindus indica) fruit cover: Kinetics and equilibrium studies”, J. Chil. Chem. Soc, Vol. 57, pp. 1224-1131, 2012. |
[10] | P.K. Pandey, M. Pandey, R. Sharma, “Defluoridation of water by biomass;Tinospora cordifolia”, Journal of Environmental Protection, Vol. 3, pp. 610-616, 2012. |
[11] | P.S.P. Harikumar, C. Jaseela, and T. Megha, “Defluoridation of water using biosorbents”, Natural Science, Vol. 4, 245-251, 2012. |
[12] | A.K. Yadav, R. Abbassi, A. Gupta, and M. Dadashzadeh, “Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution and ground water by wheat straw, sawdust and activated bagasse carbon of sugarcane”, Ecological Engineering, Vol. 52, pp. 211-218, 2013. |
[13] | A. Balouch, M. Kolachi, F.N. Talpur, H. Khan, and M.I. Bhanger, “Sorption kinetics isotherm and thermodynamic modelling of defluoridation of groundwater using natural adsorbents”, American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 4, pp. 221-228, 2013. |
[14] | H.T. Mwakabona, M. Said, R.L. Machunda, and K.N. Njau, “Plant Biomasses for Defluoridation Appropriateness: Unlocking Their Potentials”, Research Journal in Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 3, pp. 167-174, 2014. |
[15] | C.M.V. Vardhan,and J. Karthkeyan, “Removal of fluoride from water using low-cost materials”, International Water Technology Journal, Vol. 1 pp. 120-131, 2011. |
[16] | N. Lakshmaiah, P.K. Paranjape, and P.M. Mohan, “Biodefluoridation of fluoride containing water by a fungal biosorbent”, Proceeding of the second international workshop on fluorosis prevention and defluoridation of water, [November 19-22, 1997, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp. 123-126. 1997]. |
[17] | X. Zhao, L. Zhang, and D. Liu, “Biomass recalcitrance, Part I: the chemical compositions and physical structures affecting the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose”, Biofuels, Bioproduct & Biorefining, DOI: 10.1002/bbb, 2012. |
[18] | H. S. Parmar, J. B. Patel, P. Sudhakar, and V.J. Koshy, “Removal of Fluoride from Water with Powdered Corn Cobs”, Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, Vol. 48, pp. 135-138, 2006. |
[19] | N. Gupta, V. Gupta, A.P. Singh, and R.P. Singh, “Defluoridation of Groundwater using Low Cost Adsorbent like Bagasse Dust, Aluminium Treated Bagasse Flyash, Bone Powder and Shell Powder”, Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Vol. 4, pp. 72-75, 2014. |
[20] | S. Gaspard, S. Altenor, E.A. Dawsonc, P.A. Barnes, and A. Ouensanga, “Activated carbon from vetiver roots: Gas and liquid adsorption studies”, Journoul of Hazardous Materials, Vol.144, pp.73-81, 2007. |
[21] | M. Snigdha, S.S. Kumar, M. Sharmistha, and C. Deepa, “An Overview on Vetiveria Zizanioides”, Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, vol.4, pp.777-784, 2013. |
[22] | K. G. M. Bouafou, B. A. Konan, V. Zannou-Tchoko, S. Kati-Coulibally, “Potential Food Waste and By-products of Coffee in Animal Feed”, Electronic Journal of Biology, vol.7, pp.74-80, 2011. |
[23] | G. S. Ashworth, and P. Azevedo, “Agricultural wastes”, Nova Science Publishers, Inc. New York. pp 160, 2009. |
[24] | M.K. Malde, R. Greiner-Simonsen, K. Julshamn,.and K. Bjorvatn, “Tealeaves may release or absorb fluoride depending on the fluoride content of water”, Science of the Total Environment, vol.366, pp.915-917, 2006. |
[25] | S. Sharma, V.K. Varshney, “Chemical Analysis of Agave Sisalana Juice for Its Possible Utilization”, Acta Chim. Pharm. Indica, vol.2, pp.60-66, 2012. |
[26] | C. S. Sundaram, , S. Meenakshi “Fluoride sorption using organic–inorganic hybrid type ion exchangers”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol.333, pp.58–62, 2009. |
[27] | I.O. Oladele, J.A. Omotoyinbo, and J.O.T. Adewara, “Investigating the Effect of Chemical Treatment on the Constituents and Tensile Properties of Sisal Fibre”, Journal of Minerals & Materials Characterization & Engineering, vol.9, pp.569-582, 2010. |
[28] | N.K. Mondal, R. Bhaaumik, T. Baur, B.A. Das, P. Roy, and J.K. Datta, “Studies on defluoridation of water by tea ash: an unconventional biosorbent”, Chem. Sci. Trans., vol.1, pp.239-256, 2012. |
[29] | K. Li, S. Fu, H. Zhan, Y. Zhan, and L.A. Lucia, “Analysis of the chemical composition and morphological structure of banana pseudo-stem”, BioResources, vol5, pp. 576-585, 2010. |
[30] | T. Choche, S. Shende, and P. Kadu, “Extraction and Identification of Bioactive Components from Aloe barbadensis Miller”, Research and Reviews, Journal of Pharmacognsoy and Phytochemistry, vol.2, pp.14-24, 2014. |
[31] | V.K. Chandegara, and A.K. Varshney, “Aloe vera L. Processing and Products: A review”, Int. J. Med. Arom. Plants, vol. 3, pp. 492-506, 2013. |
[32] | S. L. Fávaro, T. A. Ganzerli, A. G. V. de Carvalho Neto, O. R. R. F. da Silva, and E. Radovanovic, “Chemical, morphological and mechanical analysis of sisal fiber-reinforced recycled high-density polyethylene composites”, eXPRESS Polymer Letters, vol. 4, pp. 465–473, 2010. |
[33] | P.C. Onyenekwe, O.E. Okereke, and S. O. Owolewa, “Phytochemical Screening and Effect of Musa paradisiaca Stem Extrude on Rat Haematological Parameters”, Current Research Journal of Biological Sciences, vol.5, pp. 26-29, 2013. |
[34] | M. Iqbal, and C. Gnanaraj, “Eleusine indica L. possesses antioxidant activity and precludes carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-mediated oxidative hepatic damage in rats”, Environ Health Prev Med., vol.17, pp. 307–315, 2012. |
APA Style
Hezron T Mwakabona, Revocatus L Machunda, Karoli N Njau. (2014). The Influence of Stereochemistry of the Active Compounds on Fluoride Adsorption Efficiency of the Plant Biomass. American Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2(4), 42-47. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20140204.12
ACS Style
Hezron T Mwakabona; Revocatus L Machunda; Karoli N Njau. The Influence of Stereochemistry of the Active Compounds on Fluoride Adsorption Efficiency of the Plant Biomass. Am. J. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2(4), 42-47. doi: 10.11648/j.ajche.20140204.12
AMA Style
Hezron T Mwakabona, Revocatus L Machunda, Karoli N Njau. The Influence of Stereochemistry of the Active Compounds on Fluoride Adsorption Efficiency of the Plant Biomass. Am J Chem Eng. 2014;2(4):42-47. doi: 10.11648/j.ajche.20140204.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajche.20140204.12, author = {Hezron T Mwakabona and Revocatus L Machunda and Karoli N Njau}, title = {The Influence of Stereochemistry of the Active Compounds on Fluoride Adsorption Efficiency of the Plant Biomass}, journal = {American Journal of Chemical Engineering}, volume = {2}, number = {4}, pages = {42-47}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajche.20140204.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20140204.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajche.20140204.12}, abstract = {Several studies have reported various defluoridation capabilities of plant biomasses. The resultant variations in fluoride removal capacities are associated with the presence of different types of active functional groups in the respective biomasses. This study reports of the fluoride removal efficiencies of sisal leaf biomass in comparison. Comparison with other plant biomasses were made and hence the fluoride removal efficiencies of maize leaf (ML), goose grass (GG), banana false stem (BFS), Aloe vera (AV), untreated sisal fibre (USF) and sisal pith (SP) with similar active functional groups but different stereochemistry and solubility of the active compounds are reported. A portion of 0.5 g of each biomass was mixed with a 10 mg/l fluoride solution in a 10 ml portions under the same experimental conditions. The maximum fluoride removal capacity of sisal fibre biomass was found to be 26.6 %. By comparison, the fluoride removal efficiencies of ML, GG, BFS, AV, USF and SP were found to be, 4.1, 4.6, 7.1, 26.6, 29.4 and 47.3 % respectively. This suggests that, stereochemistry and solubility of the active compounds have a significant role to play in water defluoridation by plant biomasses, and thus, knowledge of the stereochemistry and solubility of the active compounds in plant biomass is very important to fully unlock biomass’ defluoridation potentials.}, year = {2014} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Influence of Stereochemistry of the Active Compounds on Fluoride Adsorption Efficiency of the Plant Biomass AU - Hezron T Mwakabona AU - Revocatus L Machunda AU - Karoli N Njau Y1 - 2014/08/20 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20140204.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajche.20140204.12 T2 - American Journal of Chemical Engineering JF - American Journal of Chemical Engineering JO - American Journal of Chemical Engineering SP - 42 EP - 47 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8613 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20140204.12 AB - Several studies have reported various defluoridation capabilities of plant biomasses. The resultant variations in fluoride removal capacities are associated with the presence of different types of active functional groups in the respective biomasses. This study reports of the fluoride removal efficiencies of sisal leaf biomass in comparison. Comparison with other plant biomasses were made and hence the fluoride removal efficiencies of maize leaf (ML), goose grass (GG), banana false stem (BFS), Aloe vera (AV), untreated sisal fibre (USF) and sisal pith (SP) with similar active functional groups but different stereochemistry and solubility of the active compounds are reported. A portion of 0.5 g of each biomass was mixed with a 10 mg/l fluoride solution in a 10 ml portions under the same experimental conditions. The maximum fluoride removal capacity of sisal fibre biomass was found to be 26.6 %. By comparison, the fluoride removal efficiencies of ML, GG, BFS, AV, USF and SP were found to be, 4.1, 4.6, 7.1, 26.6, 29.4 and 47.3 % respectively. This suggests that, stereochemistry and solubility of the active compounds have a significant role to play in water defluoridation by plant biomasses, and thus, knowledge of the stereochemistry and solubility of the active compounds in plant biomass is very important to fully unlock biomass’ defluoridation potentials. VL - 2 IS - 4 ER -