Due to the lack of specific flying quality criteria for UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle), most researchers use the human flying quality criteria to evaluate the UAV flying qualities. This paper, through analyzing the flying performance of the small UAVs before and after the inclusion of the control augmentation systems, has validated the applicability of human flying quality criterion such as CAP and bandwidth criterions to small UAVs and proposed a means of evaluating the flying quality research of UAVs. The research of this paper can provide a reference for the future research of UAV flying quality and help for the design of UAV as well as its flying control system.
Published in | Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems (Volume 5, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.acis.20170502.12 |
Page(s) | 29-32 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
UAV, Control Augmentation System, Flying Quality, Bandwidth Criterion
[1] | Ning, Dai, Hui, Yang. Flying quality specification research of UAV, Flight Dynamics journal, 2005,23(4): 13-15. |
[2] | Yu jin, Tao, Jian pei, Wang. Flying quality standard research of UAV, Flight Dynamics journal, 2010, 28(1): 13-15. |
[3] | Feng, Wang, Sheng jun, Qi. Applicability research of Some typical flying quality to UAV, Flight Dynamics journal, 2013, 31(5): 389-3935. |
[4] | Cheng tao, Huang, Li xin, Wang. Longitudinal flying quality evaluation of UAV under remote mode, Flight Dynamics journal, 2013, 39(4): 427-431. |
[5] | M. Christopher Cotting. Applicability of Human Flying Qualities Requirements for UAVs, Finding A Way Forward [C]. 27th AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, 2009: 1-18. |
[6] | Holmberg, J., and King, D. J., Flying Qualities Specifications and Design Standards for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, AIAA-2008-6555. |
[7] | Jin yuan, Gao, Lu yu, Li. Aircraft flying quality, 2003. |
[8] | Foster, T., M. and Bowman, J. W. Dynamic Stability and Handling Qualities of Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, AIAA-2005-1023. |
[9] | Giorgio Guglieri, Barbara Pralio, Fulvia Quagliotti. Flight control system design for a micro aerial vehicle [J]. Engineering & Aerospace Technology, 2006,78(2): 87-97 |
[10] | Zi quan, Zhou. Flying test engineering, 2010. |
[11] | Orkun Simsek, Ozan Tekinalp. System Identification and Handling Quality Analysis of a UAV from Flight Test Data, AIAA-2015-1480. |
[12] | Elisa Capello, Giorgio Guglieri. Preliminary assessment of flying and handling qualities for mini-UAVs, Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2012. |
APA Style
Zhian Yan, Hudan Sun. (2017). The Research on Longitudinal Flying Quality of Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems, 5(2), 29-32. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.acis.20170502.12
ACS Style
Zhian Yan; Hudan Sun. The Research on Longitudinal Flying Quality of Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Autom. Control Intell. Syst. 2017, 5(2), 29-32. doi: 10.11648/j.acis.20170502.12
AMA Style
Zhian Yan, Hudan Sun. The Research on Longitudinal Flying Quality of Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Autom Control Intell Syst. 2017;5(2):29-32. doi: 10.11648/j.acis.20170502.12
@article{10.11648/j.acis.20170502.12, author = {Zhian Yan and Hudan Sun}, title = {The Research on Longitudinal Flying Quality of Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle}, journal = {Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems}, volume = {5}, number = {2}, pages = {29-32}, doi = {10.11648/j.acis.20170502.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.acis.20170502.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.acis.20170502.12}, abstract = {Due to the lack of specific flying quality criteria for UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle), most researchers use the human flying quality criteria to evaluate the UAV flying qualities. This paper, through analyzing the flying performance of the small UAVs before and after the inclusion of the control augmentation systems, has validated the applicability of human flying quality criterion such as CAP and bandwidth criterions to small UAVs and proposed a means of evaluating the flying quality research of UAVs. The research of this paper can provide a reference for the future research of UAV flying quality and help for the design of UAV as well as its flying control system.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Research on Longitudinal Flying Quality of Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle AU - Zhian Yan AU - Hudan Sun Y1 - 2017/04/21 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.acis.20170502.12 DO - 10.11648/j.acis.20170502.12 T2 - Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems JF - Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems JO - Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems SP - 29 EP - 32 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5591 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.acis.20170502.12 AB - Due to the lack of specific flying quality criteria for UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle), most researchers use the human flying quality criteria to evaluate the UAV flying qualities. This paper, through analyzing the flying performance of the small UAVs before and after the inclusion of the control augmentation systems, has validated the applicability of human flying quality criterion such as CAP and bandwidth criterions to small UAVs and proposed a means of evaluating the flying quality research of UAVs. The research of this paper can provide a reference for the future research of UAV flying quality and help for the design of UAV as well as its flying control system. VL - 5 IS - 2 ER -